Sunday, May 25, 2014

Nandikeśvarakāśikā




śrīgaṇeśāya namaḥ[1]||
namaḥ śivāya devāya sarvajñaparamātmane[2]|
yasyonmeṣanimeṣābhyāṃ vyaktāvyaktam idaṃ jagat||1||
śrīguruṃ śrīkumārañ ca[3] śaivatattvaviśāradaṃ|
praṇamya nandikeśādiśivabhaktān[4] muhur muhuḥ||2||
kārikām[5] ādisūtrāṇāṃ[6] nandikeśakṛtāṃ śubhām |
lokopakāriṇīṃ divyāṃ vyākaromi yathāmati||3||

Homage to Gaṇeśa!
1.             Homage to Śiva, the God, the omniscient supreme Self by whose expansion and contraction (or opening and closing the eyes) this universe becomes manifest and unmanifest.
2,3. Repeatedly offering obeisances to the holy teacher who is proficient in śaivatattva (Śiva’s true essence), to the holy Kumāras, and to the devotees of Śiva beginning with Nandikeśa, I am writing to the best of my understanding about an auspicious, helpful for the mankind, and wonderful explanation of the original aphorisms (sūtras) composed by Nandikeśa.

nṛttāvasāne[7] naṭarājarāja nanāda ḍhakkāṃ navapañcavāram|
uddharttukāmaḥ sanakādisiddhān etad vimarśe śivasūtrajālam||1||

1.      At the end of the dance, the king Naṭarāja sounded dhakka (or damaru - Śiva’s two-sided drum) nine and five times. While explaining[8] this net of śiva-sūtras, I (Nandikeśvara) wish to elevate[9] Sanaka and the other realised beings (siddhas)[10].


iha sakalalokanāyakaḥ paramaśivaḥ sanaka-sanandana-sanatkumāra-[11]-patañjali-vyāghrapāda-vasiṣṭhādīn  uddharttukāmo ḍhakkāninādavyājena caturdaśasūtratattvam upadideśa| tadanu te munīndravaryāś cirakālam āśritānām asmākaṃ caturdaśasūtrātmakaṃ tattvam upadidikṣuḥ iti|  asya sūtrajālasya tattvārthaṃ nandikeśo jānātīti taṃ praṇamya pṛṣṭavantas teṣāṃ caturdaśakārikārūpeṇa tattvaṃ sūtrāṇām upadeṣṭum icchann idam ācakṣat|| nṛttāvasāne[12] iti | aham iti śeṣaḥ | naṭarājarāja ity anena maṅgalādīni darśitāni | naṭarājarāja iti viśvavilāsavaicitrya[13]-camatkārapravīṇatvāt| svātmatattvaṃ vāgādyagocaram iti jñāpanārthaṃ ḍhakkāninādavyājena sanakādīn uddharttukāmaḥ navapañcavāraṃ caturdaśavāraṃ svāntaragatam ātmatattvaṃ prakaṭayituṃ  ḍhakkāninādaṃ tad-[14] udbhūtavarṇṇātmakaṃ| jālam atirahasyam etat śivasūtrajālaṃ vimarśe sphuṭīkaromīty arthaḥ| tatrādyena sūtreṇa savarṇavaṇānāṃ  samastabhuvanānāñ ca samudbhavaṃ svātmatattvam upadiṣṭam||1|| akāro brahmeti| atra sarvatra sūtreṣu anyavarṇacaturdaśakaṃ dhātvartham|[15] anyavarṇajālaṃ śabda iti| tathoktam indreṇa|| antyavarṇasamudbhūtā dhātavaḥ parikīrttitā iti|

Here, Paramaśiva (the supreme Lord), the ruler of the entire world taught the essence of the fourteen sūtras for elevation of [sages] Sanaka Sanandana Sanatkumāra Patañjali Vyāghrapāda Vasiṣṭha and others by artifice of striking the drum. After that, these chosen ones among great sages [thought]: “Among us who have taken refuge [in Paramaśiva], Nandikeśa wants to teach the truth contained in the fourteen sūtras for a long time [and] he knows the true meaning of his (Śiva’s) net of sūtras,” [so] offering obeisance they asked him [to teach]. Desiring to teach the essence of those sūtras, he explained it in the form of the fourteen verses. nṛttāvasāne (at termination of dance), aham (I) is to be supplied [to complete the sense], [and] naṭarājarāja (the king Naṭarāja) - these are words which show pure auspiciousness and alike. naṭarājarāja is [called so] because of [his] expertise in diverse [creative] pleasures of manifestation of the world. Since the essence of his own nature is an adobe of speech etc., so, in order to bring to light his own internal essential nature, [there came] a sound of the drum consisting of letters produced from that [sound]. The artifice of sounding the drum nine and five times, i.e. fourteen times, served to inform [and] emancipate Sanaka and others. jalam (net) means the most secret [thing], etat (this) indicates the net of śivasūtras, and vimarśe means ‘I give an explanation’. There (in this text), the origin and the essence of nature of homogeneous letters and all worlds are described by the first sūtra. The letter ‘a’ is Brahma. Here in all sūtras, the arrangement of other letters into fourteen [groups] has the purpose [to form] dhātu (grammatical roots). Another net of letters is a word. In this respect, it is said by Indra:[16] “dhātus are proclaimed to be produced from other letters”.

akāro brahmarūpaḥ syān nirguṇaḥ sarvavastuṣu||
citkalām iṃ[17] samāśritya jagadrūpaḥ uṇ īśvaraḥ||2||[18]

2.      The letter ‘a’ is a form of Brahma devoid of qualities (nirguṇa) [present] in all things. Resorting to citkalā (an aspect of cit, or consciousness) [denoted by] ‘iṃ’, [he becomes] Īśvara, the Lord in the form of the universe, [denoted by] ‘uṇ’.


aḥ parameśvaraḥ iṃ māyām[19] āśritya uḥ[20] vyāpakaḥ paraḥ āsīt| a-brahma ity atra asad vā idam agra āsīt|[21] sa brahma agra akṣarātmaka āsīt| tato vai sad ajāyata[22] | akṣarāt sakalaguṇam āsīd ity arthaḥ| akṣarāṇām akāro asmīti ca|[23]
akāraḥ sarvavarṇāgryaḥ prakāśaḥ paramaḥ śivaḥ[24]|
ādyam antyena saṃyogād aham ity eva jāyate||[25]
ādir antyena saheteti ādir akāraḥ| antyo hakāraḥ| akārādihakārāntā varṇāḥ samabhavat|
sarvaṃ parātmakaṃ sarvajñasvamātram idaṃ jagat|
jñaptyā garbhāvaśājātmā[26] madhyamā vāk samīritā[27]|| iti[28]
           
‘a’, or Parameśvara, resorting to ‘i’, or Māyā (power of delusion), became then an omnipresent ‘u’. Here, (the expression) ‘a - Brahma’ means that ‘in the beginning of this [creation], there was only asat (non-existence)’. That Brahma, imperishable[29] by nature was in the beginning. Afterwards, sat (existence) emerged. It means that the immanent aspect[30] emerged from the imperishable (or transcendent). So also: “Among letters, I am the letter a”.
The letter ‘a’, the first among all other letters, is the light (prakāśa), the supreme Śiva.  So, aham (I) is born from the union of the initial [letter ‘a’] with the last [letter ‘ha’].
[If we apply the rule] ādir antyena sahetā,[31] then the first letter is ‘a’, the last letter is ‘ha’. The letters beginning with ‘a’ and ending with ‘ha’ appeared together.  
This world is nothing but the omniscient self, the supreme self of all. By [the power] of cognition the unborn self free from birth [becomes] an uttered middle [level of] speech (madhyamā vāk).  

sarvavastuṣu parāpaśyantīmadhyamāvaikhary[32]-ādiṣu iṃ citkalām āśrityety atra gāyatrī  īḥ tāṃ padminīm iti| atra sūtre īkāras tu noktaḥ ikārasyaiva prakaṭitam[33]| atra varṇasaṃbhavakāle aiuṛḷ iti varṇapañcakam eva sarveṣāṃ ekonapañcāśadakṣarāṇāṃ bhūtapañcakānāṃ  pañcavargāṇāṃ krameṇa yoniḥ| hrasvadīrghabhedāt dvividhokārasyaiva sarvasvatantratā| tathā ca uktaṃ|
akāraṃ sannidhīkṛtya jagatāṃ kāraṇatvataḥ|
ikāraḥ sarvavarṇānāṃ śaktitvāt kāraṇaṃ matam[34]||
jagat sraṣṭum abhūd vāñchā[35] yadā  hy āsīt tadābhavat|
kāmabījam iti prāhur munayo vedapāragāḥ||[36]
           
 sarvavastuṣu (in all existing things) means ‘at parā, paśyantī, madhyamā, and vaikharī  levels of speech’. [The expression] iṃ citkalām āśritya (resorting to ‘i’ which is an aspect of consciousness) denotes here Gāyatrī [while] ‘īḥ’ [is identified with] her lotus. However, the letter ‘ī’ is not mentioned here in the sūtra. There is only an evidence of the letter ‘i’. Here, when ‘a’, ‘i’, ‘u’, ‘ṛ’, and ‘ḷ’ were brought together, these five letters one by one became a source of five classes of consonants [each consisting] of five elements [in which] the entire alphabet of fifty one letters [is arranged]. There are two kinds of letter ‘u’ because [it is] subdivided into long and short [forms]. This is truly freedom of all [vowels]. And so it was said:   
The letter ‘i’ in its proximity to the letter ‘a’ is understood as the cause of all letters due to its power [and] potentiality to be the cause of the worlds.
When there was a desire to manifest the world, then it happened so. The seers who mastered the Vedas called it ‘the seed of desire’.
   
uktaṃ ca|
svaprakāśaparamātmavastuno dṛśyamānajagaṭaḥ sisṛkṣayā|
kāmataḥ paraśivapraveśanaṃ[37] kāmabījam idam eva niścitam||
bindur[38] bindudvayārūḍhaḥ sārdhayoni[39]-svarūpikā[40]|
mahākāmakalārūpam ātmānaṃ cintayet striye[41]||iti|
uḥ vyāpakatvenāsīd ity atra| ukāro viṣṇur ity āhur vyāpakatvān maheśvarīti||[42]

It is also said:
The seed of desire is the entrance to the supreme Śiva because the desire to create visible worlds comes from the essence of the self-effulgent supreme Self. This indeed is quite certain.
Bindu (dot) developed into a double bindu assumes an image of half yoni (womb). Oh beloved, one should contemplate on the Self appearing as an aspect of the great desire.
Here, ‘uḥ’ appeared by the power of omnipresence. [They] say that the letter ‘u’ is Viṣṇu, [and it is] Maheśvarī due to its omnipresence.  

ṛḷk sarve ḷ[43] māyākhyaṃ vistāritacarācaram|
vṛttim āśritya cidrūpo janayāmāsa ca[44] balaḥ[45]||3||[46]

3. ‘ṛḷk’ is everything. Engaged in the activity called Māyā, or ‘ḷ’, [the Lord who is] consciousness and power by nature produced (or gave birth to) the expanded world of movable and immovable.

nanu sarvavedānteṣu parameśvara eka niścitatvāt māyām āśritya jagadrūpo abhūd ityukter advaitahāniḥ syād ity āśaṅkyāha| ṛḷk sarve[47] iti|  ṛ parameśvaraḥ ḷ māyākhyāṃ[48] manovṛttim āśritya idaṃ carācaraṃ janayāmāsa| ṛtaṃ satyaṃ paraṃ brahmetyādi[49] ṛt paraṃ satyam ity arthaḥ|
vṛttivṛttimator atra bhedaleśo na vidyate|
candracandrikayor yadvad vāgarthāv iva sundarīti[50]||
mama vṛttimato rūpaṃ ḷkāraḥ parameśvarīti|[51]
atra carācaraṃ janayāmāsety uktam janyajanakabhāvāt| advaitahānir ity āśaṅkyāha||

However, he says in doubt: “Since all Vedānta schools maintain a strong position that Parameśvara is One, then being engaged in Māyā [he] assumed the form of the universe, which means destruction of non-duality”. So, ṛḷk sarve (‘ṛḷk’ is everything). ‘ṛ’ is Parameśvara. Being engaged in the mind activity called Māyā, or ‘ḷ’, [he] became an origin of this world of movable and immovable. “ṛta (settled order) is the truth, supreme Brahma etc.” confirms that ‘ṛt’ is the supreme truth.
There is no difference here between two functions, or activities (vṛttimat). Oh, beautiful lady, like the moon and the moon light so also are the word and its meaning.
The letter ‘ḷ’ is a form of my activity, the supreme Goddess Parameśvarī.
He says in doubt: “Here [in the verse], it is told that [he] produced the world of movable and immovable because there is a relationship of producer and produced (janaya-janaka), [but] this destroys non-duality.”

eoṅ māheśvarāv[52] aikyaṃ vijñānaṃ sarvavastuṣu[53]|
sākṣitvāt sarvabhūtānāṃ sa eka iti niścitam||4||[54]

4. ‘eoṅ’ is known as oneness of Maheśvara and Maheśvarī in all things. It is strongly maintained that he is One because he is the witness of all existing beings.

eoṅ iti| a-akṣaraḥ| i-māyāyuktaḥ san| u-jñānarūpaḥ prajñānātmā| sarvavastūnāṃ ekatvāt advaitāpattiḥ na nānātvaṃ janyajanakatvaṃ ca svayaṃ praviśya tadrūpeṇa varttata ity arthaḥ| vaṭabījanyāyena ceti pūrvasūtradvayajanitavarṇapañcakam eva sakala-[55]           -jagatkāraṇam iti proktaṃ| uttarasūtra[56]-varṇānām api tasmād eva sambhavaḥ| samaṣṭivyaṣṭi-[57]bhedena pūrvavarṇadvitīyasya pūrvavarṇatṛtīyasya ca saṃyogam idaṃ sūtraṃ| saṃbandham api ekatve coktaṃ|

 In regard to [the sūtra] ‘eoṅ’: ‘a’ is imperishable, ‘i’ is united with Māyā [and] being so [it becomes] ‘u’ which has the form of knowledge, omniscient by nature. Oneness of all things [and] absence of multiplicity and relationships such as between creator and created lead to non-dualism. He himself having entered [the world] assumed its form. Just as a Banyan tree seed, so also a group of five letters appearing in first two sūtras become the cause [or the seed] of the entire universe [or universe with form], this was declared. The letters in the subsequent sūtras also originate from those [five letters]. This sūtra is an aggregate, or a conjunction (saṃyoga) of the third letter with the first and the second letter with the first through distinct relationship of the whole and a part (= samaṣṭi-vyaṣṭi). The connection (saṃbandha) was also said to exist in oneness.
  
śṛṇu tvaṃ sāvadhānena caturṇām api sāmyatām[58]|
vedānāṃ ca mahāvākyaṃ[59] catuṣkānām ihocyate||
brahmaśabdena yad vastu tat[60] prajñānam[61]  udīritam[62]|[63]
tad brahma sarvasākṣitvān tat tvam asy[64] eva satyataḥ[65]|
           anyatva cāraṇārthāya[66] ayam ātmety atharvaṇa[67]||4|| iti[68]

Listen attentively about equality of all four Vedas. The great sayings [of Upaniśads] consisting of four [statements] are spoken here in this world. Whatever is expressed by the word Brahma[69], it is said to be omniscience (or wisdom, or intelligence). tat (that) refers to Brahma because [he is] the witness of all, so tat tvam asi (you are that) is the only truth. The difference [of sayings] is for the purpose of distinction between Vedic schools. [The saying] ‘ayam ātma...’ (this Self...) belongs to the Atharva Veda.  


aiauc brahhma[70]-rūpaḥ sajagat[71] svāntargataṃ tataḥ|
icchayā vistaraṃ kartum āvir āsīt kṛpānidhiḥ[72]||5||

5. ‘ai-auc’ has the nature of Brahma who has the universe concealed within himself. Then, [he], an ocean of compassion, became manifest by [the power of] his own will to expand the world.  

svātmabhūtasya parameśvarasya jagatkāraṇatvaṃ katham ity āśaṅkyāha| aiauc iti| tataḥ svāntargataṃ jagad visphāritum icchuḥ ai jñānaśaktiyuta iti ataḥ pūrvasūtragata akāra-ikāradīrghayogasyaiva ekāratvaṃ| atra saḥ  prajñānasvarūpaparameśvaro yaḥ pūrvasūtrāntaragatabhāvaḥ| uktaṃ svaravimarśinyām| ukārajñānasaṃyogāt sarvasaṃbhūtir[73] iṣyate|[74] evaṃ tattvasamudāyānāṃ dvādaśavarṇānāṃ śivādiprakṛtyantānām udbhavaḥ| prakṛtipuruṣavivekam uttaratra kapaysūtre upasaṃhāratvena paṭhyate| atra hrasvadīrghaprabhedāt caturdaśasvarāṇām eva kīrttanaṃ| caturdaśabhuvanacaturdaśacakracaturdaśaprakārāṇām iti niṣkarṣaḥ|

How can Parameśvara being within his own Self become a cause of the universe? - He says in doubt. [The reply is] ‘aiauc’. Then, desirous to shine forth (or manifest) the world concealed within himself (or unmanifest), [he becomes]) ‘ai’, a combination of knowledge and power. Therefore, the characteristics of sound ‘e’ are concealed in the first sūtra, [i.e. the sound ‘e’] is a combination of long sounds ‘ā’ and ‘ī’. Here, in the state of being within the first sūtra, he is the supreme Lord, consciousness by nature. It is said in the Svaravimarśiniī:  “The manifestation of everything is said to derive from the combination of the letter ‘u’ with knowledge.” In this way the assemblage of primary elements (tattvas), [or] twelve letters, beginning with Śiva and ending with prakṛti came into being. The distinction between puruṣa and prakṛti is taught later in the sūtra ‘kapay’ by the ulterior statement. The number of the fourteen vowels only is [given] here due to division into short and long [forms]. This is the essence of the fourteen worlds, fourteen cakras, and fourteen classes.  

atra śivagaurīsaṃvāde
tava mantre[75] maheśāni mama rūpaṃ[76] tvam eva hi|
caturdaśātmakaṃ cakraṃ tava cakram itīritam||
trayodaśātmakaṃ turyaṃ  āvayor mantram ambike|
tac chūnyakāle[77] bindvātmā tasmād akṣarasambhavaḥ||
bindusphuṭana[78]-mātreṇa varṇānāṃ ca samudbhavaḥ|
tasmād ākāśamukhyāni bhūtāni samajāyata||
binduḥ srīcakrarājasya parabrahmātmakas[79] tv iti|
caturdaśātmakaṃ[80]  paścāc cakrākāreṇa saṃbhavaḥ[81] ||5||[82] iti

Here is the dialogue between Śiva and Gaurī:
In your mantra, oh Maheśānī, you are indeed my form. The cakra, consisting of fourteen [parts] is proclaimed to be your carka.
Oh Ambikā, our mantra is the fourth state (turya) consisting of thirteen parts. At the time of dissolution, that [mantra] has the nature of bindu from which all the letters originate. 
             Also, the letters come into being by mere expansion of the bindu from which the primary elements such as space etc originated.
            Bindu has the nature of the supreme Brahma (or the Absolute) of the royal śrīcakra.  Afterwards, the fourteen [vowels] were originated from the letter ‘a’ in the cakra.  

bhūtapañcakam etasmāt hayavaraṭ maheśvarāt||
vyomavāyvambuvahnyākhyabhūtāny āsīt sa eva hi||6||[83]

6. A group of five elements which are ‘ha-ya-va-raṭ’ originated from that Maheśvara. He indeed became the elements called space, wind, water, and fire.

tata ātmanaḥ sakāśād ākāśādibhūtasaṃbhavam[84] āha| bhūtapañcakam iti| sa eva parameśvaraḥ|
 hakārād vyomasaṃbhūtir[85] yakārād vāyur ucyate|
 rakārād vahnis[86] toyaṃ tu vakārād iti śaivavāk||[87]
tasmād ātmanaḥ ākāśaḥ saṃbhūta iti| tasmāt parameśvarād bhūtapañcakātmakaṃ ākāśādikaṃ prapañcakāraṇam āsīt|  atrāsmin sūtre bhūtapañcakam āsīd iti uktam|6|| ākāśāḍi bhūtacatuṣṭayam evoktam| na pṛthvīty ākāṅkṣāyām| yadādhārasvarūpaṃ samastakāraṇam iti sūtrāntareṇāvocat|

Thereafter, he says that the elements beginning with space originated from the presence of Self. In regard to bhūtapañcakam (a group of five elements): sa eva (only he) means Parameśvara.
According to śaivas’ speech (vāk), the manifestation of the space element (vyoma) comes from the letter ‘ha’, from ‘ya’, wind is said to derive, fire derives from ‘ra’, water derives from ‘va’.
Space (ākāśa) originated from that Self. The cause of further expansion comprised of five elements beginning with space [comes] from that Parameśvara. In this sutra, it is said that he became a group of five elements. (6) [However,] only a group of four elements beginning with space was mentioned. There is no earth element to complete the sense. He told in the sūtra, that the cause of everything is [something] which has the nature of support.    

ādhārabhūtaṃ bhūtānām annādīnāṃ ca kāraṇam||
ānnād retas tato jīvaḥ kāraṇatvāl laṇīritam||7||[88]

7. [‘laṅ’] is the element of support, the cause of food etc., and living beings. Semen derives from food. From that [semen], a living being [is born]. ‘laṇ’ was proclaimed due to its causative force.

ādhārabhūtam iti| bhūtānāṃ prāṇijātānāṃ[89] udbhijjādīnāṃ[90] pradhānādhārabhūtatvāt pṛthvī punaś cānnapānādīnāṃ kāraṇatvāt|| pratyekatvena laṇityādīritam ity arthaḥ||7||

ādhārabhūtam (the element of support) is used in the sense of earth because [this is] a primary element of support of what exists (bhūtānām), or living beings born from seeds etc., and also, because [the earth is] the cause of food, drinks etc.. This is the reason to deal with ‘laṇ’ and so forth singly. (7)

śabdasparśau rūparasagandhāś ca ñamaṅaṇanam|
vyomādīnāṃ guṇādīni[91] jānīyāt sarvavastuṣu||8||[92]

8. Sound and touch, form, taste, and smell are ‘ña-ma-ṅa-ṇa-nam’.
   One should know peculiar qualities of [elements] beginning with air etc. in all things.

tataḥ pṛthivyādīnāṃ kāraṇatve sthitānāṃ tanmātrāṇāṃ samutpattikramam āha| śabdasparśāv iti tantroktenoddhāṭitam| anyatra bījanirṇayabhedā bahavaḥ santi| pañcavargeṣv antimārṇā śabdasparśādayo guṇā iti vākyānīti||8||

Thereafter, he says about a succession of manifestation of established subtle elements (tanmātras) as the cause of earth etc. [The word] śabdasparśāv (sound and touch) [is explained] according to a selected [passage] from the tantras. There are many divergences of opinions regarding bīja (seed) elsewhere. There are statements that the qualities beginning with sound and touch are the final letters of five series (vargas) of consonants. 

jha-bhañ asau virāḍrūpacidātmanaḥ sarvajantuṣu vijñeyam[93]|
sthāvarādau na vākyāni vargāṇāṃ turyavarṇayoḥ||9||[94]
9. ‘jha-bhañ’ should be recognised in all living beings as [him who] has the nature of consciousness in the form of the supreme intellect (virāja). There are no [such] statements in regard to inanimate [objects] and so on. 

jhabhañ iti| virāḍrūpaśivasya prāṇijātasya jhakārabhakārau[95] sthāvarādiṣu vinā vijñeyāv ity arthaḥ||9|| atha kramaprāptapādādikam āha|

The meaning of ‘jha-bhañ’ is that the letters ‘jha’ and ‘bha’ should be recognised as belonging to Śiva in the form of the supreme intellect of living beings, excluding inanimate objects. (9) Now he says in successive order about [action faculties] beginning with the foot.

ghaḍhadhaṣ sarvabhūtānāṃ pādapāyū upasthakaḥ|
karmendriyagaṇā hy ete jātā hi paramātmanaḥ||10||[96]

10. ‘gha-ḍha-dhaṣ’ are the organ of locomotion, the excretory organ, and the organ of reproduction of all the creatures. These groups of action faculties are brought into existence by the supreme Self.  

ghaḍhadhaṣ iti| paramātmanaḥ śivasakāśāt ime karmendriyagaṇāḥ pādapāyūpasthā ghaḍhadhavarṇā jātā ity arthaḥ||10||[97]

The meaning of ‘gha-ḍha-dhaṣ’ is that these groups of action faculties [such as] organs of locomotion, the excretory organs, and the organs of reproduction are letters ‘gha-ḍha-dhaṣ’ brought into existence by the supreme Self, or derive from Śiva. (10)

śrotratvaṅnayanaghrāṇajihvādhīndriyapañcakam|
sarveśām api jantūnām īritaṃ jabagaḍadaś ||11||[98] iti

11. ‘ja-ba-ga-ḍa-daś’, also proclaimed to belong to all living beings, are five senses: ear, skin, eye, nose, and tongue.

śrotratvag iti| varṇānāṃ ca madhyavargesthā jñānendriyajanakam iti vijñeyam ity arthaḥ||11|| tataḥ prāṇādipañcakamanobuddhyahaṅkārāḥ samunmīlyante||

śrotratvag (ear, skin) also means that among the letters, [the syllables  ja-ba-ga-ḍa-da] occupy the middle position in [their respective] series of consonants [and they] should be known as generating cognitive faculties. (11) Thereafter, mind, intellect, limited egoity, and a group of five beginning with the vital air (prāṇa) are disclosed.  

prāṇādipañcakaṃ caiva mano buddhir ahaṃkṛtiḥ|
babhūvuḥ[99] kāraṇatvena khaphachaṭhathacaṭatav||12||[100]

12. ‘kha-pha-cha-ṭha-tha-ca-ṭa-tav’ became by the force of causality a group of five [elements] beginning with the vital air (prāṇa) as well as mind, intellect, and limited egoity.

prāṇādipañcakam iti|
vargadvitīyavarṇotthaḥ prāṇādyāḥ pañcavāyavaḥ|
ādya[101]-vargātrayāj jātā antaḥkaraṇavṛttaya||[102] iti
anyadvayasamudbhūtau puruṣaprakṛtiguṇeti ca|
etair aṣtāvarṇaiḥ prāṇādipañcakaṃ manobuddhyahaṅkārāś ca jagatāṃ kāraṇatve saṃbhūtā ity arthaḥ||12||

The meaning of prāṇādipañcakam (a group of five beginning with the vital air) is [as follows]:
 The letters in the second position in the series of consonants are five winds beginning with prāṇa. The activities of the inner instruments (antaḥkaraṇa) emerge from the initial [letters] of three series of consonants. Moreover, the qualities of puruṣa and prakṛti originated from the other two [series of consonants].
It means that a group of five vital airs beginning with prāṇa plus mind, intellect, and limited egoity came into existence through these eight letters being the cause of the worlds. (12)

prakṛtiṃ puruṣañ caiva sarveṣām eva sammatam|
saṃbhūtam iti vijñeyaṃ kapay syād ity ahoditam[103]||13||

13. Surely he says that ‘ka-pay’ is to be known as a combination [of procreative principles which] are truly regarded by everyone just as prakṛti (nature) and puruṣa (primordial being).

tataḥ sarvaprāṇikāraṇatve ādyantavarga[104]-dvayādyakṣaragrahatve sampuṭībhāvaḥ prakṛtipuruṣābhyāṃ prakāśayati|| prakṛtim iti| kakārapakārajātau prakṛtipuruṣāv ity arthaḥ||13|| tato’vasthātrayaṃ nirūpayati sattvaṃ rajas tama iti|| 

Thereafter, the existing space between two hemispheres [made of] puruṣa and prakṛti illuminates being the cause of all living beings when initial letters of the first and the last series of consonants are taken together. [The verse beginning with] prakṛtim means that both classes of the letters ‘ka’ and ‘pa’ are prakṛti and puruṣa. (13) Thereafter, he describes three states which are sattva, rajas, and tamas.    

sattvaṃ rajas tama iti guṇānāṃ tritayaṃ purā||
samāśritya mahādevaḥ śaṣasar krīḍati prabhuḥ||14||[105]

14. The great God (Mahādeva) assuming in the beginning a triad of qualities (guṇas) sattva (purity), rajas (activity), and tamas (inertia) ‘śa-ṣa-sar’ the mighty one plays.

purā sṛṣṭeḥ prāk śaṣasavarṇasaṃbhūtasattvarajastamoguṇān āśritya paramaśivaḥ sarvabhūteṣu krīḍatīty arthaḥ|  
śakārād rajasotpannaḥ[106] ṣakārāt tāmasodbhavaḥ|
sakārāt sattvasaṃbhūtir iti triguṇasaṃbhavaḥ||[107]
 sarvatattvajanakaḥ tattvātītajñāpanārthaṃ sūtram etac cakāra iti||14||

This means that purā (in the beginning), or before the emanation, the supreme Śiva (Paramaśiva) assuming qualities of sattva, rajas, and tamas produced from ‘śa-ṣa-sa’ plays in all living beings.
rajas arises from the letter ‘śa’, the quality of tāmas derives from the letter ‘ṣa’, sattva is produced from the letter ‘sa’. Thus, three qualities came into existence.
The progenitor of all constituent categories made this sūtra with the purpose of making known the supreme category.

tattvātītaḥ paraḥ sākṣī sarvānugrahavigrahaḥ|
aham ātmā paro hal syād iti śambhus tirodadhe||15||[108]
iti śrīmat sarvalokopakārinandikeśaracitā kāśikā samāptāḥ||16||

15. “I am Self, a supreme witness beyond the categories of existence, the form of complete grace, the final (or supreme) hal” - saying thus Śambhu disappeared.  
16. Thus ends the commentary composed by Nandikeśa, a saviour of the whole world.

sarvānugrahavigrahaḥ sākṣī tattvātītaḥ hal syād iti ḍhakkāninādavyājena sarveṣāṃ munijanānāṃ tattvam upadiśan tirodadhe[109] ity arthaḥ||15|| ity ādinandikeśvarakṛta sūtravimarśinī samāptā||
kaśikāyāḥ ṭīkāsamāptāḥ || śubham|| śivadattena likhitaṃ svārthaṃ|| śubham astu||[110]   

The meaning is that having taught the truth - ‘hal’ is the form of compete grace, a witness beyond the categories of existence - to all the saints by the artifice of sounding the drum, he disappeared. (15) Deliberations on the sūtras composed by Nandikeśvara are completed. The notes on the commentary are finished. [Be] auspicious! Written by Śivadatta [to express] the original meaning. Be auspicious!



[1] A: śrīdugdhavināyakāya namaḥ ||
[2] V: sarvajñāya mahātmane                                                                                                                       
[3] V: guruṃ śivaṃ kumārañ ca
[4] V: nandikeśādīn śivabhaktān
[5] V: kāśikām
[6] B: ādisūtrasya
[7] V: nṛtyāvasāne
[8] vimarśe (in the locative case, singular, masculine adverbial noun from mṛś 6P) literally means ‘within discussion, examination, explanation’. The translation here is based on the gloss in the commentary “vimarśe sphuṭīkaromi” - vimarśe means ‘I explain’. Also, the commentator explains that vimarśe here is for metrical purposes: vimarśe iti chāndasaṃ bodhyam.
[9] uddharttukāmaḥ is considered to be of obscure origin. It is a bhahuvrīhi samāsa = ud-hartum kāmaḥ yasya saḥ (he, whose desire is to elevate) where ‘m’ of tumun affix in hartum is deleted according to Kāśikāvṛtti 6.1.144: samastate vikalpena makāralopo vidhīyate| lumped avaśyamaḥ kṛtye tuṃkāmamanasor api|
[10] The four realised beings are four Kumāras, sons of Brahma born out of his mind - Sanaka, Sanātana, Sanandana and Sanatkumāra.
[11] V: includes nandikeśa in the list.
[12] A,B: nṛttāvasāna
[13] A,B: -vaicitya-
[14] B: tatad-
[15] This line resembles a part of verse 2 in V:  अत्र सर्वत्र सूत्रेषु अन्त्यवर्णचतुर्दशम्।
                                                 धात्वर्थं समुपादिष्टं पाणिन्यादीष्टसिद्धये॥२॥  
Translation: Here in all the sūtras, the fourteen final letters are taught to achieve desired efficiency of Pāṇini’s etc. [grammar] in [conveying] the meaning of dhātus (verbal roots).                 
[16] Indra is possibly a grammarian mentioned in Pāṇini’s Aṣṭṣdhyāyī.
[17] B:  citkalābhiḥ; V: citkamām iṃ
[18] Verse 3 in V.
[19] emend. V: māyām; A,B: moghām. moghām (useless, false) is an adjective which has no noun to qualify in the sentence. It is possible that māyām was corrupted into moghām because य is often confused in the manuscripts with घ and मो differs from मा by one stroke only.
[20] emend. A,B: u
[21] Taittiriya Upaniśad 2.7.1
[22] emend. A,B: sadājayatā
[23] Bhagavad Gīta 10.33
[24] V: parameśvaraḥ.
[25] Verse 4 in V.  pādas ab occur in Sanketapaddhati.
[26] emend. garbhāvaśājātmā; V: virbhāvam āsādya; B: garbhāvam āśa[tm/?]ā; A: garbhāva[s/t]ājātmā 
[27] A: tam īritā
[28] These lines resemble pādas ab and d in verse 5 and pādas cd in verse 6 of Nandikeśvara in V:
सर्वं परात्मकं पूर्वं ज्ञप्तिमात्रमिदं जगत्।
ज्ञप्तेर्बभूव पश्यन्ती मध्यमा वाक् ततः स्मृता॥५॥
वक्त्रे विशुद्धचक्राख्ये वैखरी सा मता ततः ।
सृष्ट्याविर्भावमासाद्य मध्यमा वाक् समा मता ॥६॥
Translation:
5. In the very beginning, this entire world was pure cognition consisting entirely of the parā (the highest) [level of speech]. The paśyantī (i.e. seeing speech) [level of speech] emerged from cognition [and] then became known as madhyamā (the middle) [level of] speech.
6. Then in the mouth, in viśuddha cakra, it (speech) is considered as vaikharī. Having come close to the state of manifestation, it is thought of as madhyamā [level of] speech.
[29] The words agra and akṣara refer to both Brahma and the letter ‘a’. Brahma is the first, or eldest (agra), among gods and he is an imperishable (akṣara) spirit. The letter ’a’, in its turn, comes first (agra) among the letters and it can be called akṣara as well as any other letter of the alphabet (for example, the alphabet is called akṣrasamāmnāya in the Mahabhāśya). Since these alphabets came out of ‘Śiva himself, who is immortal, these varnas are known as akṣaras (deathless). The jaal (net) that the Supreme God knitted is called akṣaramala.  
[30] From that akṣara, imperishable Brahma or ‘a’ comes sakalaguṇam. It seems that sakalaguṇam can also be interpreted as referring to both, Brahma and the letter ’a’: as qualities of the material, immanent world divided into parts or as phonetic characteristics of the Sanskrit vowels.
[31] Pāṇini, Aṣṭādyāyī 1.1.71. The rule says that the initial item (ādiḥ) together with (saha) the last (antyena) marker (iṭā) denotes itself and all the items before ‘iṭ’, thus, constituting a siglum (pratyahāra). Here in case of aham, strictly speaking, the rule cannot be applied because ‘ha’ is not a marker, ‘iṭ’, or anubandha. aham is only a kind contraction of the entire alphabet in a manner similar to pratyahāras.
[32] emend. A,B: vaikhayādiṣu
[33] emend. A,B: prakaṭītam
[34] V: gatam  
[35] V: icchā
[36] These are verses 7 and 8 in V.
[37] V: paraśivaprakāśitaṃ
[38] V: bījam
[39] emend. A,B: sodvayeni-
[40] V: -svarūpakam
[41] V: priye
[42] Verse 9 in V: अकारो ज्ञप्तिमात्रं स्यादिकारश्चित्कला मता।
                 उकारो विष्णुरित्याहुर्व्यापकत्वान्महेश्वरः ॥९॥
Translation: The letter ‘a’ is pure cognition. The letter ‘i’ is known as an aspect of consciousness (cit).  They say that the letter ‘u’ is Viṣṇu (and it is) Maheśvara due to its omnipresence (or pervasiveness).  
[43] A: ṛḷk sarvai[sa/śa][ḷ/?]
[44] A,B: [va/ca/ba]. In the Mss A,B ‘va’ stands for both, ‘va’ and ‘ba’.
[45] A,B:[va/ca/ba]laḥ
[46] Verse 10 in V: ऋऌक् सर्वेश्वरो मायां मनोवृत्तिमदर्शयत् ।
                 तामेव वृत्तिमाश्रित्य जगद्रूपमजीजनत् ॥१०॥
Translation: A group of letters ‘ṛ ḷ’ is Sarveśvara (the Lord of Everything, the Infinite Being) [who] showed Māyā, the activity of the mind. Assuming only that activity he brought into being the form of the universe.
[47] emend. A,B: sarva
[48] emend. A,B: mākhyāṃ
[49] A quotation from Narāyaṇa suktam.
[50] In V, this is verse 11 where pāda d reads: yathā vāgarthayor api. Then the translation of the last two pādas would be: just as the moon and the moon light so also are the word and its meaning.
Verse 12 is not found in this recension: स्वेच्छया स्वस्य चिच्छक्त्या विश्वमुन्मीलयत्यसौ।
                                    वर्णानां मध्यमं क्लीबमृऌवर्णद्वयं विदुः॥
Translation: He reveals the universe by the will [which is] his own power of consciousness. Among the letters these two letters are known as androgynous, placed in the middle.
[51] In V, there is a quotation from Śrītantra: matto hyabhūn manorūpaḥ ḷkāraḥ parameśvarī
[52] V: māyeśvarātmy. It means that the aphorism ‘eoṅ’ has the nature of Māya and Maheśvara united together.
[53] emend. A,B: sarvavapha.
[54] Verse 13 in V.
[55] B: sakale-
[56] emend. A,B: uttaratra
[57] emend. A samīṣṭavyaṣṭi-; B samīṣṭamaṣṭi-
[58] V: sāmyatā
[59] V: mahābhāga
[60] V: tattva-
[61] V: jñānam
[62] V: itīritam
[63] The pādas cd in V: prajñānaṃ brahma yasmād dhi tasmād brahmāsmyahaṃ tataḥ||
[64] emend.A,B: nāssy  
[65] V: tattvataḥ
[66] V: vāraṇatvāya
[67] V: etyapi varṇyate
[68] According to V, the verses are cited from Sanakadakśiṇāmūrti saṃvādamahāvākyavivaraṇa.
[69] The word Brahma occurs three times in four Upaniṣads’ great sayings: prajñānam brahma (Aitareya Upaniṣad 3.3 of the Ṛgveda), aham brahmāsmi (Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 1.4.10 of the Yajurveda), tat tvam asi (Chāndogya Upaniṣad 6.8.7 of the Samaveda), ayam ātmā brahma (Mandukya Upaniṣad 1.2 of the Atharvaveda).
[70] emend. A,B: brahmaṇa. The verse is unmetrical in A,B.
[71] V: san jagat
[72] V: mahāmuniḥ. This is verse 14 in V.
[73] B: sarvabhūtir
[74]The commentary in V contains a quotation from Iśvaravimarśinī: akārekārokārāṇāṃ hrasvadīrghāṇāṃ saṃyogāt sarvasaṃbhūtir iṣyata iti
[75] V: mantram
[76] emend. A,B: rūpa
[77] V: ucchūnakāle
[78] V: bindusphoṭana-
[79] emend. A,B: parabrahmātmakam
[80] V: caturdaśātmakaḥ
[81] emend. A,B: saṃbhava
[82] This is a quotation from Śivagaurīsaṃvāda Mahāmantratattvaprakāśinī.
[83] This is verse 15 in V.
[84] B: sakāśādibhūte saṃbhavam
[85] V: vyomasaṃjñaṃ ca
[86] emend. A,B: vahni
[87] V: saiva vāk. This is verse 16 in V.
[88] This is verse 17 in V.
[89] A: prāṇijātīnāṃ
[90] emend. A: udbhijjādīnī; B: udbhijādīni
[91] V: guṇā hyete
[92] Verse 18 in V.
[93] A: vijñayam
[94] The verse seems to be corrupted because the first line is unmetrical and the verse does not mention any tattvas corresponding to the letters. The whole verse resembles verse 19 in V: 
                                वाक्पाणी च झभञासीद्विराड्रूपं चिदात्मनः।
                      सर्वजन्तुषु विज्ञेयं स्थावरादौ न विद्यते ।
                     वर्गाणां तुर्यवर्णा ये कर्मेन्द्रियमया हि ते॥१९॥
Translation: Also, ‘jha-bhañ’ are speech and hand of [him who] has nature of consciousness in the form of      the supreme intellect (virāja). He should be known in all living beings except immovable (or inanimate things) etc. The forth syllables in the series of consonants are composed of faculties of action.
[95] emend. A,B: jakārabakārau
[96] Verse 20 in V.
[97] A,B: kramaprāptapādādikam āha| The expression in the Mss seems to be a scribal error. It is out of place and the same phrase occurs just before verse 10. 
[98] Verse 21 in V.
[99] V: babhuva
[100] Verse 22 in V.
[101] V: madhya-
[102] Verse 23 in V.  
[103] V: niścitam. This verse is 24 in V.
[104] emend. A,B: ādyantavarṇa-
[105] Verse 25 in V.
[106] emend. V: rajasobhūtiḥ; A: raja utpanna; B: rūja utpannaḥ.
[107] Verse 26 in V.
[108] Verse 27 in V.
[109] emend. A,B: stirodadhe.
[110] This line is not found in B.

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Jayadrathayāmala

Джаядратха ямала 3.15.250-262
Одина из ранних Бхайрава тантр.

Медитация на высшее Я.

Эта медитация отличается от общепринятых медитаций Шайва традиций в том смысле, что здесь нет отождествления практикующего с Шивой для проведения ритуала. Практикующий визуализирует себя, своё я окончательно самодостаточным и тожественным с Бхайравой в любой момент.

sarveṃdriyāni saṃyamya mano hṛdi niyamya ca //
mano buddhir ahaṃkāro [bhū]tapañc{āñc}ātmanas tathā /
atha sarvāṇi bhūtāni tasminn eva niveśayen //
Связав органы чувств и удерживая ум в сердце (или центре), следует направить туда же все категории существования состоящие из пяти элементов, ум интеллект и эго. 

tasmāt pravarttate sargaṃ tasminn e{r}va nivarttate /
antaḥsukhamayī buddhiś caitanyajyotir avyayā //
Создание приходит оттуда, и туда же удаляется . 
Интеллект наполненяется внутренним счастьем, которое есть нетленный свет сознания .

ātmā sarvasya lokasya sarvāvasthāpavarjitaḥ/
tāvad vikalpito bhāvaḥ sarvāvasthāsv abhāvitaḥ //
Это душа всего мира , где нет различий в состояниях [ бытия ].
Такая медитация в  уме должна поддерживаться независимо от любых состояний, 

yāvad ātmani nātmānaṃ na viṃdati na paśyati /
yadā sarvamayo hy ātmā ekatvenātmani sthitaḥ //
до тех пор пока не увидишь себя внутри самого себя.
Поскольку самость состоит из этого мира и находится только в себе самой,

ātmānam ātmanā paśyen meghayukto yathā raviḥ /
dhvastamoho [’]tha niḥsaṃgo nirīhināntarātmanā //
то виденье себя в себе становится возможым, как возможо увидеть солнце сквозь облако.
 Так как самость не имеет привязонностей, то и заблуждения ума будут уничтожены и у него не будет никаких привязанностей.

vijñānātmāpare brahme niveśya paramātmani /
yasmiṃ nivarttitaḥ pāśai[s] tasmai duḥkhāni sarvaśaḥ //
Следует направить свое я, к Высшему Брахману, своему высшему Я, которое есть знание, ибо самость не преодолевшая оковы будет подлеживать бесчисленные страдания.

sarvadvaṃdvavinodārthaṃ pratyagātmani mokṣadaḥ /
ādityacakṣur viśvātmā brahmaivātmāmṛtaṃ bhavet //
 [ Но ] она дарует освобождение всем душам дабы  уничтожить всякую двойственность. Его глаза - солнце , Он состоит из мироздания, этот Брахман и станет нектаром для души.

ity evaṃ ya[t] svam ullāsaṃ viṃda{ṃ}ti suniraṃtaram /
advaitaṃ paramānaṃdaṃ niṣkaṃpaṃ supratiṣṭhitam //
Это то, что незамедлительно  приводит к экспансии своего Я, которое недвойственно, высшее блаженство и устойчивое спокойное состояние.

na tan paśyāmi yasyāhaṃ na tat paśyāmi yan mama /
aham evāditaḥ śāṃtaḥ sarvajñaḥ sarvakṛt prabhuḥ //
 [ Необходимо осознавать: ] Я не вижу ничего, чему я мог бы принадлежать, я не вижу ничего, что может принадлежать мне. Я обладаю покоем от начала [ творения ] , я всемогущий и всеведущий Господь .

jagajjanetā bharttāhaṃ pitaraṃ ca pitāmaham /
ahaṃ sarvagataḥ prāṇaḥ prāṇahīnaḥ prabhuḥ paraḥ //
Я порождаю этот мир, я поддерживаю его, я его отец и дед - предок. Я всепроникающая жизненная энергия , и я верховный Господь лишенный жизненной силы.

parasya parato nāsti mamaiva paramātmanaḥ /
ekatvena bahutvena nistaraṃgo [’]ham eva ca //
Нет ничего выше верховного высшего Я, которое есть единственное Я меня самого. Я тот кого не беспокоят волнения единства и дискретности.

paraḥ saṃpūrṇṇarūpo [’]haṃ trailokyabharaṇātmakaḥ /
bhairavaḥ sunirāvādhi paramānaṃda{ṃ}vṛ[ṃ]hitaḥ //
 Я высшее существо, абсолютно совершенное, я поддерживаю три мира, я - Бхайрава, безграничный, высшей радостью могучий.  

Thursday, April 18, 2013

śrī mahāgaṇapatiṁ bhaje’haṁ


The composition of Jayachamaraja Wodeyar.
rāga: aṭāṇā; ādi tāla.



line 1 Pallavi

श्री महागणपतिं भजेऽहं शिवात्मजं षन्मुखाग्रजम्

śrī mahāgaṇapatiṁ bhaje’haṁ śivātmajaṁ ṣanmukhāgrajam

śrī (Nom. sg. m.) – holy, radiant (an honorific prefix);  mahāgaṇapatiṁ  (Acc. sg. m.)- great Lord or controller of gaṇas (demi-gods and spirits, attendants of Lord Shiva);  bhaje (Present, 1st person. sg.) –praise; ahaṁ - I; śivātmajaṁ (Acc. sg. m.=śiva-ātma-ja) – born from Śiva himself ṣanmukhāgrajam (Acc. sg. m.= ṣaḍ-mukha-agraja) –  the elder brother of the six-headed  (Murugan, Skanda)


line 2 Anupallavi


श्रितगणसेवितं विघ्ननाशकं शीघ्रवरप्रसाददायकम्

śritagaṇasevitaṁ vighnanāśakaṁ śīghravaraprasādadāyakam

śritagaṇasevitaṁ (Acc. sg. m. = śrita-gaṇa-sevitaṁ)  - who is followed by,  or served by, subservient gaṇas; vighnanāśakaṁ (Acc. sg. m.= vighna-nāśaka) –the destroyer of obstacles;  śīghravara prasādadāyakam (Acc. sg. m.=  śīghra-vara-prasāda- dāyaka) – who quickly grants boons and prasād (he remnants of offerings to God).

line 3 Madhyama kālam

सदयं कपिलमुनि वरदायकं गुरुसेवशक्तं हेरंबम्

sadayaṁ kapilamunivaradāyakam gurusevaśaktaṁ heraṁbam

 sadayaṁ  (Acc.sg.m.) merciful; kapilamunivaradāyakam (Acc.sg.m. = kapila-muni-vara-dāyaka) who grants the boons of the sage Kapila (one of the 7 ṛṣi who gave a wish-fulfilling stone cintamāni to Gaṇeṣa so that Gaṇeṣa becomes capable to grant the same boon to fulfill all desires); gurusevaśaktaṁ (Acc.sg.m.= guru-seva-śaktaṁ)  - who (Gaṇeṣa) is capable of service to the spiritual teacher (guru) (or who has the power of the service to guru)? (here it can be two different names: guruseva and śakta  which can be translated as – who is absorbed in the serves to Guru and who is a devotee of  Śakti, Goddess ; heraṁbam (Acc.sg.m.) - boastful, one of the names of Gaṇeṣa.


line 4 Charanam 1

ज्ञानमुद्रालंकृतं मूलाधारनिवासिनम्

jñānamudrālaṁkṛtaṁ  mūlādhāranivāsinam

jñānamudrālaṁkṛtaṁ  (Acc.sg.m.= jñāna-mudrā-alaṁkṛta) adorned with the sign of knowledge , or wisdom; mūlādhāranivāsinam (Acc.sg.m.= mūlādhāra-nivāsina) who dwells in the mūlādhāra cakra.

line 5 Charanam 2

गजारण्यवासिनं ज्योतिर्मयं उपनिषदसारं पञ्चभूतात्मकं सिन्धुरप्रियं पञ्चमातङ्गमुखम्

gajāraṇyavāsinaṁ jyotirmayaṁ upaniṣadasāraṁ pañcabhūtātmakaṁ sindhurapriyaṁ pañcamāṭaṁgamukham

gajāraṇyavāsinaṁ = gaja-araṇya-vāsinam – who dwells in the forest of elephants; jyotirmayaṁ = jyoti-maya – consisting of light;   upaniṣadasāraṁ =  upaniṣada-sāraṁ - the essence of the Upanishads; pañcabhūtātmakaṁ = pañca-bhūta-ātmaka - who has the nature of the five constituent elements of the universe (earth, fire, water, air, ether);    sindhurapriyaṁ  = sindhura- priyaṁ - the best, or most beloved among the elephants; pañcamāṭaṁgamukham = pañca-māṭaṁga-mukham – who has five elephant heads.

line 6 Charanam 3

कामेषनयनाह्लादकं नागलिङ्गवरपुत्रं श्रीविद्याचित्प्रभानन्दराजयोगीन्द्रसन्नुतम्

kāmeṣanayanāhlādakanāgaliṅgavaraputraṁ śrīvidyācitprabhānandarājayogīndraṣannutam

kāmeṣanayanāhlādakanāgaliṅgavaraputraṁ  =  kāmeṣa- nayanā-āhlādaka - nāga-liṅga-vara-putraṁ - the son who is the boon (coming from) the liṅga adorned with snakes at which  (liṅga)(Goddess) who has lovely eyes has looked with delight ;    śrīvidyācitprabhānanda rājayogīndrasannutam = śrī-vidyā-cit-prabhā-ānanda-rāja- yogī-indra-sannutam

sannutam – (from sam+ nuta – praised, revered) – praised by the Lord (Indra) among the yogins who practice royal path of Yoga (rājayogī) who is citprabhānanda , that is,  he is in the state of pure happiness (ānanda is the quality of the Ultimate reality, Brahma, pure happiness. So,  he is in this state) which arises from citprabhā – light of cit, or consciousness of śrividyā. (śrividyā in its turn can mean a goddess of wisdom, the science which leads to liberation, śrīvidyā sect, exalted science)

note: the last compound is indeed a play of words with multiple meaning so also it can be translated as : Gaṇeṣa is praised by śrīvidyācitprabhānanda (by the one who is in a blissful state of knowing śrīvidyā) who is rājayogīndra (here the compound can be resolved in 2 ways – praised by rāja , or king, yogin and by Indra or – praised by the Lord among yogins who practice the royal path of yoga).
TRANSLATION
(line1)I praise Great Lord of gaṇas, born of Shiva, the elder brother of the six-headed (Murugan), (line 2) who is followed (or served by) subservient gaṇas (demi-gods), the destroyer of obstacles,  who quickly grants boons and prasād (he remnants of offerings to God), (line 3) merciful, who grants the boons of the sage Kapila, who is the power of service to guru, boastful one, (line 4) adorned with the sign (sacred gesture) of wisdom (jñānamudrā), who dwells in the mūlādhāra cakra (line 5) who dwells in the forest of elephants, who is consisting of light, who is the essence of the Upanishads, who has the nature of the five elements of the universe, most beloved among the elephants,  who has five elephant heads (line 6) the son who is the boon of the liṅgam (Śiva’s symbol) adorned with the snake (nāgadeva, Lord of nāgas),  at which  (liṅgam) (the Goddess) with lovely eyes looked with delight; who is praised by the Lord among yogins practicing the royal path who is citprabhānanda  (who is in the state of happiness  coming from the light of knowledge) of śrividyā .
 




 




 




 










 




 




 





 




 




 




 




 




 
 



 






 





 





 





 

 
 
 
 



 

 



 



 



 

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Cross-Cultural Perspective on Kashmiri Shaivism

In this paper, I will focus on two contemporary western scholars in the field of Kashmiri Shaivism: Alexis Sanderson and Mark Dyczkowski. I believe that their work in the various schools of Kashmiri Shaiva philosophy is of unique value and it forms an intriguing chapter in the history of Indology as an evolving science with cross-cultural aspects. Their writing seems to develop beyond the limits of traditional Indological scholarship and introduces a new set of critical approaches towards the body of Kashmiri tantric texts with a significantly cross-cultural dimension.
These new approaches reflect a more interactive way of working with the material – rather than maintain a set of viewpoints that are somehow fixed ‘outside’ the tradition, they are drawn towards the ways in which it actively reflects upon itself by means of an ongoing and open-ended hermeneutic process. This process consists partly in re-visioning the poetic symbols and principal concepts within the body of tantric texts by successive generations of Kashmiri teachers.
It is also remarkable that these western scholars seem to be themselves interested in such reflective methods of engagement with Kashmiri Shaiva literature - each one has chosen, in his own way, to work closely and intimately with the tradition by initiating a set of critical dialogues that have, as their terms of cross-cultural reference, specific questions about the nature of consciousness and individuality, language and its relation to reality, the phenomenology of perception, etc .
It is my thesis that questions regarding the value of individual subjectivity and the search for a deeper basis of personal freedom and agency in western cultural contexts provide scope for a fruitful dialogue with the systems of Kashmiri Shaivism. The two contemporary scholars I have chosen to look at - Mark Dyzckowski, and Alexis Sanderson – seem to be interested in critical study of a key concept in Kashmiri tantric texts: transpersonal egoity (‘pUrnAhantA’). This concept defines the individual subject or person in terms of a universal and unlimited self that is comprised of a pure and reflective consciousness (‘vimarsa’) which is also active and dynamic (‘Shakti’). ‘Shakti’ is the capacity of consciousness (Shiva) to identify with itself without any limitations as pure egoity (ahambhAvaH or pUrNAhantA) or I-consciousness .
The notion that there is a deeper and more universal level of consciousness which actively underlies the individual personality and constitutes both the self and world of experience, seems to challenge the principles of conventional western psychology with its empiricist bias . However, it also complements and supports more contemporary findings of modern physics as well as developments in the fields of depth-psychology and phenomenology . For scholars like Sanderson and Dyczkowski, this concept of ‘pUrNAhantA’ in Kashmiri tantra is significant not only for understanding the Kashmiri tradition but also as a means of exploring the limits of knowledge about individuality and subjectivity in their own cultures .
Alexis Sanderson began his career in Indology at Oxford University and in 1972 he studied Kashmiri Shaivism with Swami Lakshmanjoo, the last living teacher of this tradition. Alexis understood that he had to approach the Kashmiri tradition in terms of how it actively reflected upon itself – that is to say, the tradition (‘parampara’) was a living force based on the valid experience of each individual exponent:
“The interpretation of the texts was rooted not only in his (Swami Lakshmanjoo) pupilage with his teacher Rajanaka Maheshvara, but also in his own living experience, and if I came on occasions to the opinion that it departed to some degree from the intention of the texts themselves these departures were evidence that the tradition had not declined into a mere repetition of the formulations of the past but was indeed still a living force with the capacity for creative exegesis that enables such traditions to evolve.”
This insight is crucial because it comes from an understanding of the role of the self-reflective individual as agent and actor in the Kashmiri tantric system. The individual self or person (‘kartA’) is here defined in terms of an absolute power of consciousness (Shakti) that actively projects, manifests, maintains, and reabsorbs the entire phenomenal world of experience through self-reflection. In the words of Sanderson:
“The celebrant …was to experience … a twelve-phased retraction of his power of cognition, from his initial self-dichotomisation in which it represents itself as projecting the object external to itself, through the resorption of this object and its own reversion through deeper and deeper levels to its autonomous and universal source pulsing from beyond time and individuality in the emission and resorption of the relations of agent, act and object of cognition that constitute the universe of experience.”
There are several aspects in this vision of the individual subject as Sanderson finds it defined in Kashmiri Shaiva traditions. Firstly, we see that the relation between subject and object, self and world, mind and matter, is here posited very differently from traditional approaches in western science and psychology where there has been a long-standing split between the two realities with the object or the material world existing as somehow dominant . Here, in a reversal of perspective, the subject is not only recognised as prior but also as creative and actively constituting objective reality. Therefore, there is no split here but rather a vision of a reflecting and cognizing subject that actively projects and withdraws phenomena.
A scholar like Sanderson, trained in comparative approaches to religion and philosophy, can see how the existent split between subject and object has carried with it a repressed sense of fear and anxiety that is an inhibitory force upon the agency of the individual subject or ego . The tantric vision of an integral self, for Sanderson, has a significant potential for deepening insights into prevailing paradigms of individuality and personhood in modern western sociology and psychology. His approach also opened headway in interpreting the deeper religious and social role of impurity, complementing both in Tantric ritual and to the history of religions generally.
We can also see that according to Sanderson, the self as defined in Kashmiri tanric traditions is not a fixed entity or substance (‘dravya’) but is constituted in the term of pure energy or power – it is absolutely relational in essence. The relationship between the actor, act, and object of cognition is a continuum or flow from which these three terms of reality arise as distinct aspects of experience. The relational self is envisioned as a vibrating pulse (‘spanda’) that is the movement of consciousness without pause or break. Such a concept offers a unique possibility for cross-cultural exchange because of its innately reflective character where dialogue and relationship between ‘self’ and ‘other’ are constitutive aspects. Sanderson applies this concept of the self as a hermeneutic tool by attending closely to the highly individualized and differentiated forms of expression within the historical and living tradition. In his research he goes through gradations of historical development by looking attentively at each distinct ‘parampara’ within the broader context of Kashmiri Shaivism in order to get the real picture of the category of person .
The next scholar I would like to examine is Mark Dyczkowski whose books and articles on the ‘Spanda’ school or ‘doctrine of Vibration’ are considered to be classics in the field. Mark Dyczkowski seems to be unique in his approach to the subject of tantra because he has chosen to live in India for most of his life and to assimilate and absorb aspects of a living tantric tradition into his scholarly work. At the same time, Dyczkowski brings to this tradition a set of critical perspectives and a methodology that are anchored in western disciplines of modern psychology, phenomenology and philosophy.
As a scholar interested in exploring more esoteric aspects of Kashmiri tantric traditions, Dyczkowski chose to focus on the ‘Spanda’ school or ‘doctrine of Vibration’ because he saw a potential here for an alternative set of perspectives than those established within classical Hindu views of self, identity and personhood . The main concept here again is of ‘Shakti’, or a living power, that animates and infuses a field of pure consciousness, known as Shiva, with the ability to create and manifest the entire phenomenal field of experience . According to this doctrine, the universe is pure pulse or dynamic energy and exists only in interrelational, and not in exclusive, or substantial, terms. In other words, there are no fixed entities apart from consciousness, but only a flow of reflective or cognitive action that continually relates between a field involving three main aspects: the subject or perceiver, the act, and the object of perception.
For Dyczkowski, this mystical and philosophical tradition holds a special value and significance because here the individual subject or perceiver is recognized in terms of an absolute capacity, or power, for self-awareness, (‘vimarsa’). As well, the self in the ‘Spanda’ school is defined as an actor (‘kartR’) or an agent who freely manifests all objective experience through an unlimited potential for creativity. This notion of freedom and sovereignty of the individual subject as pure actor seems to be critical for Dyczkowski’s understanding of tantra. As a scholar interested in western phenomenologies of individuality and personhood, like those developed by Heidegger and Merleau Ponty , Dyczkowski finds in the ‘Spanda’ paradigm of the individual self as actor and reflective consciousness (‘vimarsa’) a critical dimension which can complement and deepen his own cultural approaches. As Dyczkowski says:
“Kriyaa is vimar"sa. So he (Abhinavagupta) combines cognitive linguistics with his theory of ritual action - both held together in the essential creative (indeed at each instant cosmogonic) activity of consciousness. From his point of view consciousness is unaffected by all this activity because it is its agent - not because, as the sAmkhya say, it does nothing - or as the nyAyikas say consciousness is just a quality of the Self.”
As we see here, there are two features of the tantric subject and agent (‘kartA’) that are of compelling interest to Dyczkowski from a cross-cultural perspective. First is the notion of an absolute freedom (‘svatantraH’) that sheds light on more restrictive paradigms of self and subjectivity in western philosophy and psychology such as those of Heidegger and Freud. Secondly, the conscious subject - ‘Shiva’ - is viewed as an artist who freely creates objective reality as an end in itself rather than as a limited means . Both of these aspects provide room for critical dialogue with prevailing views of self and autonomy in western cultures.
In conclusion, it seems that Dyczkowski and Sanderson have engaged with the Kashmiri Shaiva tantric tradition and its concept of absolute agency, or ‘kartA’, in ways that allow for a multiplicity of critical perspectives and approaches. They both recognise the value of a hermeneutic process by means of which the central symbols and visionary ideas in the tantras can be reflected across historical time and cultural space. Their own work is part of this process. In many ways, the most vital contributions to tantric studies in our time are being made in western academic contexts as is testified by the rising growth of publications and university courses on this popular subject.